Defining and Deploying a Procurement Strategy for an Industrial Manufacturer

Challenge

A major player in industrial manufacturing, sourcing a wide range of components and raw materials globally, was facing significant challenges in its procurement organization:

  • Lack of strategic alignment across purchasing categories, leading to fragmented supplier relationships and suboptimal costs.
  • Over-reliance on certain suppliers, increasing risk exposure and dependency.
  • Absence of a structured approach to supplier evaluation, segmentation, and negotiation strategies.
  • No clear visibility on total spend by category and supplier, limiting the company’s ability to leverage economies of scale.

The leadership’s goal: deploy a procurement strategy that secures supply continuity, optimizes costs, and supports growth ambitions.

Diagnostic & Methodology

CoreChain conducted a detailed spend analysis and procurement capability assessment.

Data collected:

  • Supplier base mapping by category, spend, and geography.
  • Historical purchasing data (volume, price trends, payment terms, delivery performance).
  • Supplier risk profiles (single sourcing, geographical exposure, financial health).
  • Procurement process maturity assessment (from sourcing to contract management).
Methodologies applied:
  • Strategic sourcing methodology (7-step sourcing process).
  • Kraljic matrix for supplier segmentation (strategic, leverage, bottleneck, routine).
  • Total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis.
  • Risk analysis (supply chain risk mapping, dual/multi-sourcing strategies).
  • Benchmarking of category management best practices.
Solution Design & Recommendations

CoreChain defined a comprehensive procurement strategy based on three key pillars:

  1. Supplier segmentation and strategic sourcing plans by category.
  2. Cost optimization levers: negotiation strategies, demand aggregation, supplier consolidation where appropriate.
  3. Risk mitigation measures: dual-sourcing, nearshoring options, supplier development programs.

Key recommendations included:

  • Deployment of structured RFQ / RFP processes for key categories.
  • Implementation of supplier scorecards and performance reviews.
  • Integration of risk monitoring in supplier selection and contract management.
Implementation Roadmap
  • Phase 1:

Quick wins — renegotiation of priority contracts and sourcing alternatives for high-risk suppliers.

  • Phase 2:

Rollout of category management frameworks and sourcing plans.

  • Phase 3:

Supplier relationship management (SRM) program deployment with performance tracking.

Delivered tools:

  • Spend analysis dashboards.
  • Supplier risk assessment templates.
  • RFQ / RFP standard packages.
  • Supplier scorecards and contract templates.
Results & Impact
  • Average purchasing savings of 8% to 12% on addressed categories.
  • Supplier risk exposure reduced by 30% through dual sourcing and supplier diversification.
  • Improved supplier performance via structured evaluation and corrective action plans.
  • Enhanced negotiation power through better visibility on spend and demand consolidation.
  • Procurement maturity elevated from reactive to strategic partner level, supporting the company’s growth and resilience objectives.

Strategic sourcing. Secure supply. Optimized costs.